Portfolio web site of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Structured Finance |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The editor of the Journal of Structured Finance, Henry A. Davis, plubished an article in the Fall 2005 volume
that tries to define the broad term of Structured Finance:
Structured finance instruments can be defined through three key characteristics:
While this definition is still very broad, it helps to explain the characteristicts of these instruments. Now that we have this defined structure, let me explain why these instruments are useful. First, the need for these instruments grew tremendously in the 1990s as lenders (banks) wanted to remove debt securities they issued (loans, mortages, etc.) from their balance sheets. Banks were not easily able to sell these securities to investors because, by themselves, they involve a significant amount of credit risk and few investors wanted to invest in them directly. Secondly, large asset management firms stepped in to help purchase these securities and, through methods which I will explain, issue new securities that are more appealing for investors. The asset management firms would buy many of the same asset types from the banks and create a SPV that issues an amount of debt equal to the amount of the securities that the asset management firm purchased from the bank. The debt that is issued is tranched which creates several securities that have very different characterists from the underlying collateral and is more appealing to investors. The new securities can have either a very safe (low return and low volatility) or a very risky (high return and high volatility) aspect. In this section, I have created the following pages on Structured Finance:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
©2009 George Lyons. For questions or comments e-mail george@glyons.com |